Global Standards for the Microelectronics Industry
Standards & Documents Search
Title![]() |
Document # | Date |
---|---|---|
A PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING N-CHANNEL MOSFET HOT-CARRIER-INDUCED DEGRADATION UNDER DC STRESS: |
JESD28-A | Dec 2001 |
This document describes an accelerated test for measuring the hot-carrier-induced degradation of a single n-channel MOSFET using dc bias. The purpose of this document is to specify a minimum set of measurements so that valid comparisons can be made between different technologies, IC processes, and process variations in a simple, consistent and controlled way. The measurements specified should be viewed as a starting point in the characterization and benchmarking of the transistor manufacturing process. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
A PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING P-CHANNEL MOSFET HOT-CARRIER-INDUCED DEGRADATION AT MAXIMUM GATE CURRENT UNDER DC STRESS: |
JESD60A | Sep 2004 |
This method establishes a standard procedure for accelerated testing of the hot-carrier-induced change of a p-channel MOSFET. The objective is to provide a minimum set of measurements so that accurate comparisons can be made between different technologies. The measurements specified should be viewed as a starting pint in the characterization and benchmarking of the trasistor manufacturing process. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
A PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING P-CHANNEL MOSFET NEGATIVE BIAS TEMPERATURE INSTABILITIESStatus: Rescinded September 2021 (JC-14.2-21-183) |
JESD90 | Nov 2004 |
This document hasbeen replaced by JESD241, September 2021. |
||
ACCELERATED MOISTURE RESISTANCE - UNBIASED AUTOCLAVEStatus: Reaffirmed January 2021 |
JESD22-A102E | Jul 2015 |
This test allows the user to evaluate the moisture resistance of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices. The Unbiased Autoclave Test is performed to evaluate the moisture resistance integrity of non-hermetic packaged solid state devices using moisture condensing or moisture saturated steam environments. It is a highly accelerated test that employs conditions of pressure, humidity and temperature under condensing conditions to accelerate moisture penetration through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors passing through it. This test is used to identify failure mechanisms internal to the package and is destructive. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ACCELERATED MOISTURE RESISTANCE - UNBIASED HAST |
JESD22-A118B.01 | May 2021 |
The Unbiased HAST is performed for the purpose of evaluating the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid-state devices in humid environments. It is a highly accelerated test which employs temperature and humidity under noncondensing conditions to accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors that pass through it. Bias is not applied in this test to ensure the failure mechanisms potentially overshadowed by bias can be uncovered (e.g., galvanic corrosion). This test is used to identify failure mechanisms internal to the package and is destructive. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Addendum No. 1 to JESD28, N-CHANNEL MOSFET HOT CARRIER DATA ANALYSIS |
JESD28-1 | Sep 2001 |
This addendum provides data analysis examples useful in analyzing MOSFET n-channel hot-carrier-induced degradation data. This addendum to JESD28 (Hot carrier n-channel testing standard) suggests hot-carrier data analysis techniques. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ADDENDUM No. 1 to JESD35, GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR DESIGNING TEST STRUCTURES FOR THE WAFER-LEVEL TESTING OF THIN DIELECTRICSStatus: Rescinded |
JESD35-1 | Sep 1995 |
JESD35-1 was rescinded by the committee in June 2024 and has been superseded by JESD263. This addendum expands the usefulness of the Standard 35 (JESD35) by detailing the various sources of measurement error that could effect the test results obtained by the ramped tests described in JESD35. Each source of error is described and its implications on test structure design is noted. This addendum can be used as a guide when designing test structures for the qualification and characterization of thin oxide reliability, specifically, by implementing accelerated voltage or current ramp tests. Committee(s): JC-14.2 |
||
ADDENDUM No. 2 to JESD35 - TEST CRITERIA FOR THE WAFER-LEVEL TESTING OF THIN DIELECTRICS:Status: Rescinded |
JESD35-2 | Feb 1996 |
JESD35-2 was rescinded by the committee in June 2024 and has been superseded by JESD263. This addendum includes test criteria to supplement JESD35. JESD35 describes procedures developed for estimating the overall integrity of thin oxides in the MOS Integrated Circuit manufacturing industry. Two test procedures are included in JESD35: a Voltage-Ramp (V-Ramp) and a Current-Ramp (J-Ramp). As JESD35 became implemented into production facilities on a variety of test structures and oxide attributes, a need arose to clarify end point determination and point out some of the obstacles that could be overcome by careful characterization of the equipment and test structures. Committee(s): JC-14.2 |
||
APPLICATION SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION USING KNOWLEDGE BASED TEST METHODOLOGYStatus: Reaffirmed January 2021 |
JESD94B | Oct 2015 |
The method described in this document applies to all application specific reliability testing for solid state components with known failure mechanisms where the test duration and conditions vary based on application variables. This document does not cover reliability tests that are characterization based or essentially go / no-go type tests, for example, ESD, latch-up, or electrical over stress. Also, it does not attempt to cover every failure mechanism or test environment, but does provide a methodology that can be extended to other failure mechanisms and test environments. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
BOARD LEVEL CYCLIC BEND TEST METHOD FOR INTERCONNECT RELIABILITY CHARACTERIZATION OF SMT ICs FOR HANDHELD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS |
JESD22-B113B | Aug 2018 |
The Board Level Cyclic Bend Test Method is intended to evaluate and compare the performance of surface mount electronic components in an accelerated test environment for handheld electronic products applications. The purpose is to standardize the test methodology to provide a reproducible performance assessment of surface mounted components while duplicating the failure modes normally observed during product level test. This is not a component qualification test and is not meant to replace any product level test that may be needed to qualify a specific product and assembly. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Board Level Drop Test Method of Components for Handheld Electronic Products |
JESD22-B111A.01 | Jun 2024 |
This Test Method standardizes the test board and test methodology to provide a reproducible assessment of the drop test performance of surface mounted components. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
COMPONENT PROBLEM ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS - SUPERSEDED BY EIA-671, November 1996.Status: Superseded |
JESD43 | Nov 1996 |
Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CONSTANT-TEMPERATURE AGING METHOD TO CHARACTERIZE COPPER INTERCONNECT METALLIZATIONS FOR STRESS-INDUCED VOIDING |
JESD214.01 | Aug 2017 |
This document describes a constant temperature (isothermal) aging method for testing copper (Cu) metallization test structures on microelectronics wafers for susceptibility to stress-induced voiding (SIV). This method is to be conducted primarily at the wafer level of production during technology development, and the results are to be used for lifetime prediction and failure analysis. Under some conditions, the method may be applied to package-level testing. This method is not intended to check production lots for shipment, because of the long test time. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
COPLANARITY TEST FOR SURFACE-MOUNT SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESStatus: Reaffirmed February 2023 |
JESD22-B108B | Sep 2010 |
The purpose of this test is to measure the deviation of the terminals (leads or solder balls) from coplanarity at room temperature for surface-mount semiconductor devices. This test method is applicable for inspection and device characterization. If package warpage or coplanarity is to be characterized at reflow soldering temperatures, then JESD22-B112 should be used. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Customer Notification for Environmental Compliance Declaration Deviations |
JESD262 | Nov 2022 |
This standard is invoked when a supplier becomes aware that a product’s environmental compliance declaration they provided or made available to their customers had an error that might cause a customer to draw an incorrect conclusion about the compliance of the product to legal requirements. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION OF PRODUCT/PROCESS CHANGES BY SOLID-STATE SUPPLIERSStatus: SupersededBy J-STD-046, July 2016 |
JESD46D | Dec 2011 |
This standard establishes procedures to notify customers of semiconductor product and process changes. Requirements include: documentation; procedures for classification, notification and customer response; content; and records. Documentation of a suppliers change notification system should set clear and understandable expectations for both the originators of the change and their end customers. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION PROCESS FOR DISASTERS |
JESD246A | Jan 2020 |
This standard establishes the requirements for timely notification to affected customers after a disaster has occurred at a supplier’s facility that will affect the committed delivery of product. This standard puts specific emphasis on notification, timing, and notification content which includes risk exposure, impact analysis, and recovery plans. This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, solid-state products and the constituent components used within. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CYCLED TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY-BIAS WITH SURFACE CONDENSATION LIFE TEST |
JESD22-A100E | Nov 2020 |
The Cycled Temperature-humidity-bias Life Test is performed for the purpose of evaluating the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs conditions of temperature cycling, humidity, and bias that accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors that pass through it. The Cycled Temperature-Humidity-Bias Life Test is typically performed on cavity packages (e.g., MQUADs, lidded ceramic pin grid arrays, etc.) as an alternative to JESD22-A101 or JESD22-A110. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
DEVICE QUALITY PROBLEM ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION RESOLUTION METHODOLOGY |
JESD671D | Oct 2018 |
This standard addresses any Customer-initiated device problem analysis/corrective action request and Supplier/Authorized Distributor-identified device nonconformance to specification which may impact the Customer. This standard establishes a common set of Customer, Authorized Distributor and Supplier expectations and requirements that will help to facilitate successful problem analysis and corrective action of device problems, including administrative quality problems, which may affect the Customer. Formerly known as EIA-671 (November 1996). Became JESD671-A after revision, December 1999. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
EARLY LIFE FAILURE RATE CALCULATION PROCEDURE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS:Status: Reaffirmed January 2014, September 2019 |
JESD74A | Feb 2007 |
This standard defines methods for calculating the early life failure rate of a product, using accelerated testing, whose failure rate is constant or decreasing over time. For technologies where there is adequate field failure data, alternative methods may be used to establish the early life failure rate. The purpose of this standard is to define a procedure for performing measurement and calculation of early life failure rates. Projections can be used to compare reliability performance with objectives, provide line feedback, support service cost estimates, and set product test and screen strategies to ensure that the ELFR meets customers' requirements. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS ASSESSMENTStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, September 2020 |
JESD86A | Oct 2009 |
This standard is intended to describe various methods for obtaining electrical variate data on devices currently produced on the manufacturing and testing process to be qualified. The intent is to assess the device's capability to function within the specification parameters over time and the application environment (operating range of temperature, voltage, humidity, input/output levels, noise, power supply stability etc.). Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTRICALLY ERASABLE PROGRAMMABLE ROM (EEPROM) PROGRAM/ERASE ENDURANCE AND DATA RETENTION TESTStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD22-A117E | Nov 2018 |
This stress test is intended to determine the ability of an EEPROM integrated circuit or an integrated circuit with an EEPROM module (such as a microprocessor) to sustain repeated data changes without failure (program/erase endurance) and to retain data for the expected life of the EEPROM (data retention). This Standard specifies the procedural requirements for performing valid endurance and retention tests based on a qualification specification. Endurance and retention qualification specifications (for cycle counts, durations, temperatures, and sample sizes) are specified in JESD47 or may be developed using knowledge-based methods as in JESD94. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) SENSITIVITY TESTING HUMAN BODY MODEL (HBM)Status: Supersededby ANSI/ESDA/JEDEC JS-001, April 2010. |
JESD22-A114F | Dec 2008 |
This test method establishes a standard procedure for testing and classifying microcircuits according to their susceptibility to damage or degradation by exposure to a defined electrostatic Human Body Model (HBM) discharge (ESD). The objective is to provide reliable, repeatable HBM ESD test results so that accurate classifications can be performed. Committee(s): JC-14.1 |
||
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) SENSITIVITY TESTING MACHINE MODEL (MM)This document is inactive as of September 2016 |
JESD22-A115C | Nov 2010 |
JESD22-A115 is a reference document; it is not a requirement per JESD47 (Stress Test Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits). Machine Model (MM) as described in JESD22-A115 should not be used as a requirement for integrated circuit ESD qualification. Only human-body model (HBM) and charged-device model (CDM) are the necessary ESD qualification test methods as specified in JESD47. Refer to JEP172: Discontinuing Use of the Machine Model for Device ESD Qualification for more information. Committee(s): JC-14.1 |
||
ENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TIN WHISKER SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TIN AND TIN ALLOY SURFACE FINISHEDStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, January 2020 |
JESD201A | Sep 2008 |
The methodology described in this document is applicable for environmental acceptance testing of tin based surface finishes and mitigation practices for tin whiskers. This methodology may not be sufficient for applications with special requirements, (i.e., military, aerospace, etc.). Additional requirements may be specified in the appropriate requirements (procurement) documentation. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING CAPABILITY TO BOTTOM SIDE BOARD ATTACH BY FULL BODY SOLDER IMMERSION OF SMALL SURFACE MOUNT SOLID STATE DEVICES |
JESD22-A111B | Mar 2018 |
The purpose of this test method is to identify the potential wave solder classification level of small plastic Surface Mount Devices (SMDs) that are sensitive to moisture-induced stress so that they can be properly packaged, stored, and handled to avoid subsequent mechanical damage during the assembly wave solder attachment and/or repair operations. This test method also provides a reliability preconditioning sequence for small SMDs that are wave soldered using full body immersion. This test method, may be used by users to determine what classification level should be used for initial board level reliability qualification. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
EXTERNAL VISUAL |
JESD22-B101D | Apr 2022 |
External visual inspection is an examination of the external surfaces, construction, marking, and workmanship of a finished package or component. External visual is a noninvasive and nondestructive test. It is functional for qualification, quality monitoring, and lot acceptance. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MONITORINGStatus: Reaffirmed June 2011, May 2022 |
JESD659C | Apr 2017 |
This method establishes requirements for application of Statistical Reliability Monitoring 'SRM' technology to monitor and improve the reliability of electronic components and subassemblies. The standard also describes the condition under with a monitor may be replaced or eliminated. Formerly known as EIA-659, that superseded JESD29-A (July 1996). Became JESD659 after revision, September 1999. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MONITORING - SUPERSEDED BY EIA/ANSI-659, July 1996.Status: Superseded |
JESD29-A | Jul 1996 |
Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY QUALIFICATION OF SILICON DEVICESStatus: Rescinded, November 2004 |
JESD34 | Mar 1993 |
This document applies to the reliability qualification of new or changed silicon devices, and their materials or manufacturing processes. Does not address qualification of product quality or functionality. Provides an alternative to traditional stress-driven qualification. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FIELD-INDUCED CHARGED-DEVICE MODEL TEST METHOD FOR ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE WITHSTAND THRESHOLDS OF MICROELECTRONIC COMPONENTSStatus: Rescinded February 2020 |
JESD22-C101F | Oct 2013 |
The material in this test method has been superseded by JS-002-2018, published January 2019, which in turn has been superseded by JS-002-2022, published January 2023. |
||
FLIP CHIP TENSILE PULL |
JESD22-B109C | Mar 2021 |
The Flip Chip Tensile Pull Test Method is performed to determine the fracture mode and strength of the solder bump interconnection between the flip chip die and the substrate. It should be used to assess the consistency of the chip join process. This test method is a destructive test. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Gate Dielectric Breakdown |
JESD263 | Mar 2024 |
This document describes procedures developed for estimating the overall integrity of gate dielectrics. JESD263 supersedes these other 4 standards: JESD35A, JESD35-1 ADDENDUM, JESD35-2 and JESD92. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DISTRIBUTORS OF COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES |
JESD31F | Aug 2021 |
This standard identifies the general requirements for Distributors that supply Commercial and Military products. This standard applies to all discrete semiconductors, integrated circuits and Hybrids, whether packaged or in wafer/die form, manufactured by all Manufacturers. The requirements defined within this document are only applicable to products for which ownership remains with the Distributor or Manufacturer. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
HERMETICITYStatus: Reaffirmed September 2017 |
JESD22-A109B | Nov 2011 |
Testing for hermeticity on commercial product is not normally done on standard molded devices that are not hermetic. Commercial product that this test method applies to has a construction that produces a hermetic package; examples of this are ceramic and metal packages. Most of these tests are controlled and updated in the military standards, the two standards that apply are MIL-STD-750 for discretes, & MIL-STD-883 for microcircuits. The test within these standards can be used for all package types. Within these standards the tests are similar; MIL-STD-750 Test Method 1071 Hermetic Seal is recommended for any commercial hermetic requirements. For MIL-STD-883 the applicable test method is 1014 Seal. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
HIGH TEMPERATURE CONTINUITYStatus: Rescinded November 1999 |
JESD22-C100-A | Jan 1990 |
Committee(s): JC-14.1 |
||
HIGH TEMPERATURE STORAGE LIFE |
JESD22-A103E.01 | Jul 2021 |
The test is applicable for evaluation, screening, monitoring, and/or qualification of all solid state devices. The high temperature storage test is typically used to determine the effects of time and temperature, under storage conditions, for thermally activated failure mechanisms and time-to failure distributions of solid state electronic devices, including nonvolatile memory devices (data retention failure mechanisms). Thermally activated failure mechanisms are modeled using the Arrhenius Equation for acceleration. During the test, accelerated stress temperatures are used without electrical conditions applied. This test may be destructive, depending on time, temperature and packaging (if any). Committee(s): JC-14.1 Available for purchase: $55.00 Add to Cart Paying JEDEC Members may login for free access. |
||
HIGHLY ACCELERATED TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY STRESS TEST (HAST) |
JESD22-A110E.01 | May 2021 |
The purpose of this test method is to evaluate the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs severe conditions of temperature, humidity, and bias that accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors which pass through it. This is a minor editorial edit to JESD22A110E, July 2015 approved by the formulating committee. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
HYBRIDS/MCM |
JESD93A | May 2023 |
This specification establishes the general requirements for hybrid microcircuits, RF/microwave hybrid microcircuits and MCMs (hereafter referred to as devices). Detailed performance requirements for a specific device are specified in the applicable device acquisition document. In the event of a conflict between this document and the device acquisition document, the device acquisition document will take precedence. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
IC LATCH-UP TEST |
JESD78F.02 | Nov 2023 |
This standard establishes the procedure for testing, evaluation and classification of devices and microcircuits according to their susceptibility (sensitivity) to damage or degradation by exposure to a defined latch-up stress. This standard has been adopted by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) as project 5962-1880. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Information Requirements for the Qualification of Solid State Devices |
JESD69D | Jun 2024 |
This standard defines the requirements for the device qualification package, which the supplier provides to the customer. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ISOTHERMAL ELECTROMIGRATION TEST PROCEDURE:Status: Reaffirmed September 2018 |
JESD61A.01 | Oct 2007 |
This standard describes an algorithm for the execution of the isothermal test, using computer-controlled instrumentation. The primary use of this test is for the monitoring of microelectronic metallization lines at wafer level (1) in process development, to evaluate process options, (2) in manufacturing, to monitor metallization reliability and (3) to monitor/evaluate process equipment. While it is developed as a fast WLR test, it can also be an effective tool for complementing the reliability data obtained through the standard package level electromigration test. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
LEAD INTEGRITYStatus: Reaffirmed - May 2023 |
JESD22-B105E | Feb 2017 |
This test method provides various tests for determining the integrity lead/package interface and the lead itself when the lead(s) are bent due to faulty board assembly followed by rework of the part for reassembly. For hermetic packages it is recommend that this test be followed by hermeticity tests in accordance with Test Method A109 to determine if there are any adverse effects from the stresses applied to the seals as well as to the leads. These tests, including each of its test conditions, is considered destructive and is only recommended for qualification testing. This test is applicable to all through-hole devices and surface-mount devices requiring lead forming by the user. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
LOW TEMPERATURE STORAGE LIFEStatus: Reaffirmed May 2021 |
JESD22-A119A | Oct 2015 |
The test is applicable for evaluation, screening, monitoring, and/or qualification of all solid state devices Low Temperature storage test is typically used to determine the effect of time and temperature, under storage conditions, for thermally activated failure mechanisms of solid state electronic devices, including nonvolatile memory devices (data retention failure mechanisms). During the test reduced temperatures (test conditions) are used without electrical stress applied. This test may be destructive, depending on Time, Temperature and Packaging (if any). Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARK LEGIBILITY |
JESD22-B114B | Jan 2020 |
This standard describes a nondestructive test to assess solid state device mark legibility. The specification applies only to solid state devices that contain markings, regardless of the marking method. It does not define what devices must be marked or the method in which the device is marked, i.e., ink, laser, etc. The standard is limited in scope to the legibility requirements of solid state devices, and does not replace related reference documents listed in this standard. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARKING PERMANENCYStatus: Reaffirmed August 2024 |
JESD22-B107D | Mar 2011 |
This test method provides two tests for determining the marking permanency of ink marked integrated circuits. A new non-destructive tape test method is introduced to quickly determine marking integrity. The test method also specifies a resistance to solvents method based upon MIL Std 883 Method 2015. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARKING, SYMBOLS, AND LABELS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF LEAD (Pb) FREE ASSEMBLIES, COMPONENTS, AND DEVICES - SUPERSEDED BY J-STD-609, August 2007Status: Supersededby J-STD-609, August 2007 |
JESD97 | May 2004 |
Committee(s): JC-14.1, JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MEASURING WHISKER GROWTH ON TIN AND TIN ALLOY SURFACE FINISHESStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, September 2019 |
JESD22-A121A | Jul 2008 |
The predominant terminal finishes on electronic components have been Sn-Pb alloys. As the industry moves toward Pb-free components and assembly processes, the predominant terminal finish materials will be pure Sn and alloys of Sn, including Sn-Bi and Sn-Ag Pure Sn and Sn-based alloy electrodeposits and solder-dipped finishes may grow tin whiskers, which could electrically short across component terminals or break off the component and degrade the performance of electrical or mechanical parts. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL COMPRESSIVE STATIC STRESS TEST METHOD |
JESD22-B119 | Oct 2018 |
This test method is intended for customers to determine the ability of a device to withstand the mechanical compressive static stress generated when a heat sink is being initially attached to the device, and to help the customer generate design rules for their heat sink design and validate their thermal solution. This test method does not assess the long-term effects of static stress. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL SHOCKStatus: Supersededby JEDEC JESD22-B110B, July 2013 |
JESD22-B104C | Nov 2004 |
This test is intended to determine the suitability of component parts for use in electronic equipment that may be subjected to moderately severe shocks as a result of suddenly applied forces or abrupt changes in motion produced by rough handling, transportation, or field operation. Shock of this type may disturb operating characteristics, particularly if the shock pulses are repetitive. This is a destructive test intended for device qualification. It is normally applicable to cavity-type packages. |
||
MECHANICAL SHOCK – DEVICE AND SUBASSEMBLY |
JESD22-B110B.01 | Jun 2019 |
Device and Subassembly Mechanical Shock Test Method is intended to evaluate devices in the free state and assembled to printed wiring boards for use in electrical equipment. The method is intended to determine the compatibility of devices and subassemblies to withstand moderately severe shocks. The use of subassemblies is a means to test devices in usage conditions as assembled to printed wiring boards. Mechanical Shock due to suddenly applied forces, or abrupt change in motion produced by handling, transportation or field operation may disturb operating characteristics, particularly if the shock pulses are repetitive. This is a destructive test intended for device qualification.This document also replaces JESD22-B104. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING THE ELECTROMIGRATION FAILURE TIME DISTRIBUTION OF INTERCONNECTS UNDER CONSTANT-CURRENT AND TEMPERATURE STRESSStatus: Reaffirmed September 2018 |
JESD202 | Mar 2006 |
This is an accelerated stress test method for determining sample estimates and their confidence limits of the median-time-to-failure, sigma, and early percentile of a log-Normal distribution, which are used to characterize the electromigration failure-time distribution of equivalent metal lines subjected to a constant current-density and temperature stress. Failure is defined as some pre-selected fractional increase in the resistance of the line under test. Analysis procedures are provided to analyze complete and singly, right-censored failure-time data. Sample calculations for complete and right-censored data are provided in Annex A. The analyses are not intended for the case when the failure distribution cannot be characterized by a single log-Normal distribution. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
METHOD FOR DEVELOPING ACCELERATION MODELS FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE MECHANISMS |
JESD91B | Mar 2022 |
The method described in this document applies to all reliability mechanisms associated with electronic devices. The purpose of this standard is to provide a reference for developing acceleration models for defect-related and wear-out mechanisms in electronic devices. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
METHODS FOR CALCULATING FAILURE RATES IN UNITS OF FITS |
JESD85A | Jul 2021 |
This standard establishes methods for calculating failure rates in units of FITs by using data in varying degrees of detail such that results can be obtained from almost any data set. The objective is to provide a reference to the way failure rates are calculated. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MOISTURE-INDUCED STRESS SENSITIVITY FOR PLASTIC SURFACE MOUNT DEVICES - SUPERSEDED BY J-STD-020A, April 1999.Status: Rescinded, May 2000 |
JESD22-A112-A | Nov 1995 |
J-STD-020 is now on revision F. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
OUTLIER IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, RESCINDED January 2009. Replaced by JESD50.Status: RescindedJanuary 2009 |
JESD62-A | May 2002 |
Relevant JESD62 content has been consolidated into JESD50B, published October 2008 -Special Requirments for Maverick Product Elimination-. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Package Warpage Measurement of Surface-Mount Integrated Circuits at Elevated Temperature |
JESD22-B112C | Nov 2023 |
This test method is to measure the deviation from uniform flatness of an integrated circuit package body for the range of thermal conditions experienced during the surface-mount soldering operation. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PHYSICAL DIMENSION:Status: ReaffirmedJune 2006, January 2016, September 2021 |
JESD22-B100B | Jun 2003 |
The standard provides a method for determining whether the external physical dimensions of the device are in accordance with the applicable procurement document. This revision includes a change in details to be specified by the procurement document. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
POWER AND TEMPERATURE CYCLING |
JESD22-A105D | Jan 2020 |
The power and temperature cycling test is performed to determine the ability of a device to withstand alternate exposures at high and low temperature extremes and simultaneously the operating biases are periodically applied and removed. It is intended to simulate worst case conditions encountered in application environments. The power and temperature cycling test is considered destructive and is only intended for device qualification. This test method applies to semiconductor devices that are subjected to temperature excursions and required to power on and off during all temperatures. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Power Cycling |
JESD22-A122B | Nov 2023 |
This Test Method establishes a uniform method for performing solid state device package power cycling stress test. Free download. Registration or login required. |