Global Standards for the Microelectronics Industry
Standards & Documents Search
Title | Document # |
Date![]() |
---|---|---|
STEADY-STATE TEMPERATURE-HUMIDITY BIAS LIFE TEST |
JESD22-A101D.01 | Jan 2021 |
This standard establishes a defined method and conditions for performing a temperature-humidity life test with bias applied. The test is used to evaluate the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs high temperature and humidity conditions to accelerate the penetration of moisture through external protective material or along interfaces between the external protective coating and conductors or other features that pass through it. This revision enhances the ability to perform this test on a device which cannot be biased to achieve very low power dissipation. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHARACTERIZATION OF INTERFACIAL ADHESION IN SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES |
JEP167A | Nov 2020 |
This document identifies methods used for the characterization of die adhesion. It gives guidance which method to apply in which phase of the product or technology life cycle. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CYCLED TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY-BIAS WITH SURFACE CONDENSATION LIFE TEST |
JESD22-A100E | Nov 2020 |
The Cycled Temperature-humidity-bias Life Test is performed for the purpose of evaluating the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs conditions of temperature cycling, humidity, and bias that accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors that pass through it. The Cycled Temperature-Humidity-Bias Life Test is typically performed on cavity packages (e.g., MQUADs, lidded ceramic pin grid arrays, etc.) as an alternative to JESD22-A101 or JESD22-A110. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PRECONDITIONING OF NONHERMETIC SURFACE MOUNT DEVICES PRIOR TO RELIABILITY TESTING |
JESD22-A113I | Apr 2020 |
This Test Method establishes an industry standard preconditioning flow for nonhermetic solid state SMDs (surface mount devices) that is representative of a typical industry multiple solder reflow operation. These SMDs should be subjected to the appropriate preconditioning sequence of this document by the semiconductor manufacturer prior to being submitted to specific in-house reliability testing (qualification and reliability monitoring) to evaluate long term reliability (which might be impacted by solder reflow). Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION PROCESS FOR DISASTERS |
JESD246A | Jan 2020 |
This standard establishes the requirements for timely notification to affected customers after a disaster has occurred at a supplier’s facility that will affect the committed delivery of product. This standard puts specific emphasis on notification, timing, and notification content which includes risk exposure, impact analysis, and recovery plans. This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, solid-state products and the constituent components used within. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
POWER AND TEMPERATURE CYCLING |
JESD22-A105D | Jan 2020 |
The power and temperature cycling test is performed to determine the ability of a device to withstand alternate exposures at high and low temperature extremes and simultaneously the operating biases are periodically applied and removed. It is intended to simulate worst case conditions encountered in application environments. The power and temperature cycling test is considered destructive and is only intended for device qualification. This test method applies to semiconductor devices that are subjected to temperature excursions and required to power on and off during all temperatures. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARK LEGIBILITY |
JESD22-B114B | Jan 2020 |
This standard describes a nondestructive test to assess solid state device mark legibility. The specification applies only to solid state devices that contain markings, regardless of the marking method. It does not define what devices must be marked or the method in which the device is marked, i.e., ink, laser, etc. The standard is limited in scope to the legibility requirements of solid state devices, and does not replace related reference documents listed in this standard. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL SHOCK – DEVICE AND SUBASSEMBLY |
JESD22-B110B.01 | Jun 2019 |
Device and Subassembly Mechanical Shock Test Method is intended to evaluate devices in the free state and assembled to printed wiring boards for use in electrical equipment. The method is intended to determine the compatibility of devices and subassemblies to withstand moderately severe shocks. The use of subassemblies is a means to test devices in usage conditions as assembled to printed wiring boards. Mechanical Shock due to suddenly applied forces, or abrupt change in motion produced by handling, transportation or field operation may disturb operating characteristics, particularly if the shock pulses are repetitive. This is a destructive test intended for device qualification.This document also replaces JESD22-B104. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SOLID STATE RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT QUALIFICATION METHODOLOGIES |
JEP143D | Jan 2019 |
The purpose of this publication is to provide an overview of some of the most commonly used systems and test methods historically performed by manufacturers to assess and qualify the reliability of solid state products. The appropriate references to existing and proposed JEDEC (or EIA) standards and publications are cited. This document is also intended to provide an educational background and overview of some of the technical and economic factors associated with assessing and qualifying microcircuit reliability. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
GUIDELINES FOR GaAs MMIC PHEMT/MESFET AND HBT RELIABILITY ACCELERATED LIFE TESTING |
JEP118A | Dec 2018 |
These guidelines apply to GaAs Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs) and their individual component building blocks, such as GaAs Metal-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors (MESFETs), Pseudomorphic High Electron Mobility Transistors (PHEMTs), Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs), resistors, and capacitors. While the procedure described in this document may be applied to other semiconductor technologies, especially those used in RF and microwave frequency analog applications, it is primarily intended for technologies based on GaAs and related III-V material systems (InP, AlGaAs, InGaAs, InGaP, GaN, etc). Committee(s): JC-14.7 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Numerical Analysis Guidelines for Microelectronics Packaging Design and Reliability |
IPC/JEDEC9301-2018 | Dec 2018 |
This document is an effort to standardize and document some of the basic tenets of a typical Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model. The intent of this document is to help educate new designers (and in some cases even experienced designers) on the basic information and best practices that should be captured and provided to technical reviewers of the results of FEA data. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTRICALLY ERASABLE PROGRAMMABLE ROM (EEPROM) PROGRAM/ERASE ENDURANCE AND DATA RETENTION TESTStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD22-A117E | Nov 2018 |
This stress test is intended to determine the ability of an EEPROM integrated circuit or an integrated circuit with an EEPROM module (such as a microprocessor) to sustain repeated data changes without failure (program/erase endurance) and to retain data for the expected life of the EEPROM (data retention). This Standard specifies the procedural requirements for performing valid endurance and retention tests based on a qualification specification. Endurance and retention qualification specifications (for cycle counts, durations, temperatures, and sample sizes) are specified in JESD47 or may be developed using knowledge-based methods as in JESD94. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
DEVICE QUALITY PROBLEM ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION RESOLUTION METHODOLOGY |
JESD671D | Oct 2018 |
This standard addresses any Customer-initiated device problem analysis/corrective action request and Supplier/Authorized Distributor-identified device nonconformance to specification which may impact the Customer. This standard establishes a common set of Customer, Authorized Distributor and Supplier expectations and requirements that will help to facilitate successful problem analysis and corrective action of device problems, including administrative quality problems, which may affect the Customer. Formerly known as EIA-671 (November 1996). Became JESD671-A after revision, December 1999. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL COMPRESSIVE STATIC STRESS TEST METHOD |
JESD22-B119 | Oct 2018 |
This test method is intended for customers to determine the ability of a device to withstand the mechanical compressive static stress generated when a heat sink is being initially attached to the device, and to help the customer generate design rules for their heat sink design and validate their thermal solution. This test method does not assess the long-term effects of static stress. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FOUNDRY PROCESS QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES - BACKEND OF LIFE (Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Sites) |
JEP001-1A | Sep 2018 |
This document describes backend-level test and data methods for the qualification of semiconductor technologies. It does not give pass or fail values or recommend specific test equipment, test structures or test algorithms. Wherever possible, it references applicable JEDEC such as JESD47 or other widely accepted standards for requirements documentation. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FOUNDRY PROCESS QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES - FRONT END TRANSISTOR LEVEL (Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Sites) |
JEP001-2A | Sep 2018 |
This document describes transistor-level test and data methods for the qualification of semiconductor technologies. It does not give pass or fail values or recommend specific test equipment, test structures or test algorithms. Wherever possible, it references applicable JEDEC such as JESD47 or other widely accepted standards for requirements documentation. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
BOARD LEVEL CYCLIC BEND TEST METHOD FOR INTERCONNECT RELIABILITY CHARACTERIZATION OF SMT ICs FOR HANDHELD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS |
JESD22-B113B | Aug 2018 |
The Board Level Cyclic Bend Test Method is intended to evaluate and compare the performance of surface mount electronic components in an accelerated test environment for handheld electronic products applications. The purpose is to standardize the test methodology to provide a reproducible performance assessment of surface mounted components while duplicating the failure modes normally observed during product level test. This is not a component qualification test and is not meant to replace any product level test that may be needed to qualify a specific product and assembly. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) |
JEP131C | Aug 2018 |
This publication applies to electronic components and subassemblies product and or process development, manufacturing processes and the associated performance requirements in customer applications. These areas should include, but are not limited to: package design, chip design, process development, assembly, fabrication, manufacturing, materials, quality, service, and suppliers, as well as the process requirements needed for the next assembly. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RECOMMENDED ESD TARGET LEVELS FOR HBM/MM QUALIFICATIONStatus: Reaffirmed January 2024 |
JEP155B | Jul 2018 |
This document was written with the intent to provide information for quality organizations in both semiconductor companies and their customers to assess and make decisions on safe ESD level requirements. It will be shown through this document why realistic modifying of the ESD target levels for component level ESD is not only essential but is also urgent. The document is organized in different sections to give as many technical details as possible to support the purpose given in the abstract. In June 2009 the formulating committee approved the addition of the ESDA logo on the covers of this document. Please see Annex C for revision history. Reaffirmed: January 2024 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CLASSIFICATION OF PASSIVE AND SOLID STATE DEVICES FOR ASSEMBLY PROCESSES |
J-STD-075A | May 2018 |
This is a Joint Standard between ECIA, IPC, and JEDEC. The purpose of this specification is to establish an agreed to set of worst case solder assembly process conditions to which devices are evaluated. The generated PSL rating will convey the conditions to which a device can be safely attached to FR4 type or ceramic laminates using SMT reflow and solder wave/fountain soldering processes. It is important for device manufacturers (hereafter referred to as “suppliers”), users, and (PWB) assemblers to be highly familiar with this standard’s information and processes to insure optimal device quality and reliability. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD. However, this document is available to the JEDEC formulating Committee members on the JC-14 Resources tab on the Members' website. The lead organization is ECIA. Committee(s): JC-14 |
||
JOINT IPC/JEDEC STANDARD FOR HANDLING, PACKING, SHIPPING, AND USE OF MOISTURE/REFLOW SENSITIVE SURFACE-MOUNT DEVICES |
J-STD-033D | Apr 2018 |
The purpose of this document is to provide manufacturers and users with standardized methods for handling, packing, shipping, and use of moisture/reflow and process sensitive devices that have been classified to the levels defined in J-STD-020 or J-STD-075. These methods are provided to avoid damage from moisture absorption and exposure to solder reflow temperatures that can result in yield and reliability degradation. By using these procedures, safe and damage-free reflow can be achieved. The dry-packing process defined herein provides a minimum shelf life of 12 months from the seal date. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING CAPABILITY TO BOTTOM SIDE BOARD ATTACH BY FULL BODY SOLDER IMMERSION OF SMALL SURFACE MOUNT SOLID STATE DEVICES |
JESD22-A111B | Mar 2018 |
The purpose of this test method is to identify the potential wave solder classification level of small plastic Surface Mount Devices (SMDs) that are sensitive to moisture-induced stress so that they can be properly packaged, stored, and handled to avoid subsequent mechanical damage during the assembly wave solder attachment and/or repair operations. This test method also provides a reliability preconditioning sequence for small SMDs that are wave soldered using full body immersion. This test method, may be used by users to determine what classification level should be used for initial board level reliability qualification. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHIP-PACKAGE INTERACTION UNDERSTANDING, IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION |
JEP156A | Mar 2018 |
This publication references a set of frequently recommended and accepted JEDEC reliability stress tests. These tests are used for qualifying new and modified technology/ process/ product families, as well as individual solid state surface-mount products. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MAVERICK PRODUCT ELIMINATION AND OUTLIER MANAGEMENTStatus: Reaffirmed |
JESD50C | Jan 2018 |
This standard applies to the identification and control of Maverick Product that can occur during fabrication, assembly, packaging, or test of any electronic component. It can be implemented for an entire product line or to segregate product that has a higher probability of adversely impacting quality or reliability. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ADAPTER TEST BOARD RELIABILITY TEST GUIDELINES |
JEP176 | Jan 2018 |
This publication describes guidelines for applying JEDEC reliability tests and recommended testing procedures to integrated circuits that require adapter test boards for electrical and Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CONSTANT-TEMPERATURE AGING METHOD TO CHARACTERIZE COPPER INTERCONNECT METALLIZATIONS FOR STRESS-INDUCED VOIDING |
JESD214.01 | Aug 2017 |
This document describes a constant temperature (isothermal) aging method for testing copper (Cu) metallization test structures on microelectronics wafers for susceptibility to stress-induced voiding (SIV). This method is to be conducted primarily at the wafer level of production during technology development, and the results are to be used for lifetime prediction and failure analysis. Under some conditions, the method may be applied to package-level testing. This method is not intended to check production lots for shipment, because of the long test time. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
STANDARD LOGNORMAL ANALYSIS OF UNCENSORED DATA, AND OF SINGLY RIGHT -CENSORED DATA UTILIZING THE PERSSON AND ROOTZEN METHOD: |
JESD37A | Aug 2017 |
This standard details techniques for estimating the values of a two parameter lognormal distribution from complete lifetime data (all samples in an experiment have failed) or singly right-censored lifetime data (the experiment have failed) or singly right-censored lifetime data gathered from rapid stress test; however, not all types of failure data can be analyzed with these techniques. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
WIRE BOND SHEAR TEST |
JESD22-B116B | May 2017 |
This fully revised test provides a means for determining the strength of gold and copper ball bonds to a die or package bonding surface, and may be performed on pre-encapsulation or post-encapsulation parts. Pictures have been added to enhance the fail mode diagrams. The wire bond shear test is destructive. The test method can also be used to shear aluminum and copper wedge bonds to a die or package bonding surface. It is appropriate for use in process development, process control and/or quality assurance. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MONITORINGStatus: Reaffirmed June 2011, May 2022 |
JESD659C | Apr 2017 |
This method establishes requirements for application of Statistical Reliability Monitoring 'SRM' technology to monitor and improve the reliability of electronic components and subassemblies. The standard also describes the condition under with a monitor may be replaced or eliminated. Formerly known as EIA-659, that superseded JESD29-A (July 1996). Became JESD659 after revision, September 1999. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
LEAD INTEGRITYStatus: Reaffirmed - May 2023 |
JESD22-B105E | Feb 2017 |
This test method provides various tests for determining the integrity lead/package interface and the lead itself when the lead(s) are bent due to faulty board assembly followed by rework of the part for reassembly. For hermetic packages it is recommend that this test be followed by hermeticity tests in accordance with Test Method A109 to determine if there are any adverse effects from the stresses applied to the seals as well as to the leads. These tests, including each of its test conditions, is considered destructive and is only recommended for qualification testing. This test is applicable to all through-hole devices and surface-mount devices requiring lead forming by the user. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RESISTANCE TO SOLDER SHOCK FOR THROUGH-HOLE MOUNTED DEVICESStatus: Reaffirmed February 2023 |
JESD22-B106E | Nov 2016 |
This test method is used to determine whether solid state devices can withstand the effect of the temperature shock to which they will be subjected during soldering of their leads in a solderwave process and/or solder fountain (rework/replacement) process. The heat is conducted through the leads into the device package from solder heat at the reverse side of the board. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
VIBRATION, VARIABLE FREQUENCY |
JESD22-B103B.01 | Sep 2016 |
The Vibration, Variable Frequency Test Method is intended to determine the ability of component(s) to withstand moderate to severe vibration as a result of motion produced by transportation or filed operation of electrical equipment. This is a destructive test that is intended for component qualification. This is a minor editorial change to JESD22-B103B, June 2002 (Reaffirmed September 2010). Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS - EOSStatus: Reaffirmed May 2022 |
JEP174 | Sep 2016 |
This purpose of this white paper will be to introduce a new perspective about EOS to the electronics industry. As failures exhibiting EOS damage are commonly experienced in the industry, and these severe overstress events are a factor in the damage of many products, the intent of the white paper is to clarify what EOS really is and how it can be mitigated once it is properly comprehended. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE MECHANISMS AND MODELS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES |
JEP122H | Sep 2016 |
This publication provides a list of failure mechanisms and their associated activation energies or acceleration factors that may be used in making system failure rate estimations when the only available data is based on tests performed at accelerated stress test conditions. The method to be used is the Sum-of-the-Failure-Rates method. This publication also provides guidance in the selection of reliability modeling parameters, namely functional form, apparent thermal activation energy values and sensitivity to stresses such as power supply voltage, substrate current, current density, gate voltage, relative humidity, temperature cycling range, mobile ion concentration, etc. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Available for purchase: $163.00 Add to Cart Paying JEDEC Members may login for free access. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION STANDARD FOR PRODUCT/PROCESS CHANGES BY ELECTRONIC PRODUCT SUPPLIERS |
J-STD-046 | Jul 2016 |
This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, electronic products and their constituent components. This standard establishes the requirements for timely customer notification of changes to electronic products and associated processes. This document replaces JESD46. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SOLDER BALL PULLStatus: Reaffirmed September 2021 |
JESD22-B115A.01 | Jul 2016 |
This document describes a test method only; acceptance criteria and qualification requirements are not defined. This test method applies to solder ball pull force/energy testing prior to end-use attachment. Solder balls are pulled individually using mechanical jaws; force, fracture energy and failure mode data are collected and analyzed. Other specialized solder ball pull methods using a heated thermode, gang pulling of multiple solder joints, etc., are outside the scope of this document. Both low and high speed testing are covered by this document. This is a minor editorial revision to JESD22-A115A. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PROCEDURE FOR WAFER-LEVEL DC CHARACTERIZATION OF BIAS TEMPERATURE INSTABILITIESStatus: Reaffirmed September 2021 |
JESD241 | Dec 2015 |
This Bias Temperature Instability (BTI) stress/test procedure is proposed to provide a minimum recommendation for a simple and consistent comparison of the mean threshold voltage (Vth) BTI induced shift. The procedure enables comparison of stable and manufacturable CMOS processes and technologies in which the process variation is low and the yield is mature. Qualification and accept-reject criteria are not given in this document. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
APPLICATION SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION USING KNOWLEDGE BASED TEST METHODOLOGYStatus: Reaffirmed January 2021 |
JESD94B | Oct 2015 |
The method described in this document applies to all application specific reliability testing for solid state components with known failure mechanisms where the test duration and conditions vary based on application variables. This document does not cover reliability tests that are characterization based or essentially go / no-go type tests, for example, ESD, latch-up, or electrical over stress. Also, it does not attempt to cover every failure mechanism or test environment, but does provide a methodology that can be extended to other failure mechanisms and test environments. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
LOW TEMPERATURE STORAGE LIFEStatus: Reaffirmed May 2021 |
JESD22-A119A | Oct 2015 |
The test is applicable for evaluation, screening, monitoring, and/or qualification of all solid state devices Low Temperature storage test is typically used to determine the effect of time and temperature, under storage conditions, for thermally activated failure mechanisms of solid state electronic devices, including nonvolatile memory devices (data retention failure mechanisms). During the test reduced temperatures (test conditions) are used without electrical stress applied. This test may be destructive, depending on Time, Temperature and Packaging (if any). Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ACCELERATED MOISTURE RESISTANCE - UNBIASED AUTOCLAVEStatus: Reaffirmed January 2021 |
JESD22-A102E | Jul 2015 |
This test allows the user to evaluate the moisture resistance of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices. The Unbiased Autoclave Test is performed to evaluate the moisture resistance integrity of non-hermetic packaged solid state devices using moisture condensing or moisture saturated steam environments. It is a highly accelerated test that employs conditions of pressure, humidity and temperature under condensing conditions to accelerate moisture penetration through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors passing through it. This test is used to identify failure mechanisms internal to the package and is destructive. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
DISCONTINUING USE OF THE MACHINE MODEL FOR DEVICE ESD QUALIFICATIONStatus: Reaffirmed September 2020 |
JEP172A | Jul 2015 |
Over the last several decades the so called "machine model" (aka MM) and its application to the required ESD component qualification has been grossly misunderstood. The scope of this JEDEC document is to present evidence to discontinue use of this particular model stress test without incurring any reduction in the IC component's ESD reliability for manufacturing. In this regard, the document's purpose is to provide the necessary technical arguments for strongly recommending no further use of this model for IC qualification. The published document should be used as a reference to propagate this message throughout the industry. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF LOW-k/METAL INTER/INTRA-LEVEL DIELECTRIC INTEGRITY |
JEP159A | Jul 2015 |
This document is intended for use in the semiconductor IC manufacturing industry and provides reliability characterization techniques for low-k inter/intra level dielectrics (ILD) for the evaluation and control of ILD processes. It describes procedures developed for estimating the general integrity of back end-of-line (BEOL) ILD. Two basic test procedures are described, the Voltage-Ramp Dielectric Breakdown (VRDB) test, and the Constant Voltage Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown stress (CVS). Each test is designed for different reliability and process evaluation purposes. This document also describes robust techniques to detect breakdown and TDDB data analysis. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
JOINT JEDEC/IPC/ECIA STANDARD - NOTIFICATION STANDARD FOR PRODUCT DISCONTINUANCE |
J-STD-048 | Nov 2014 |
This document supersedes JESD48. This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, electronic products and their constituent components. The goal of this notification standard is to better enable customers to manage and mitigate the disruption caused by the discontinuation of a product and ensure continuity of supply. This standard establishes the requirements for timely customer notification of planned product discontinuance, which will assist customers in managing end-of-life supply, or to transition ongoing requirements to alternate products. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SOLDER BALL SHEARStatus: Reaffirmed September 2020 |
JESD22-B117B | May 2014 |
The purpose of this test is conducted to assess the ability of solder balls to withstand mechanical shear forces that may be applied during device manufacturing, handling, test, shipment and end-use conditions. Solder ball shear is a destructive test. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING OF THERMAL STRESS TEST OVEN TEMPERATURESStatus: Reaffirmed September 2019 |
JEP153A | Mar 2014 |
This document provides an industry standard method for characterization and monitoring thermal stress test oven temperatures. The procedures described in this document should be used to insure thermal stress test conditions are being achieved and maintained during various test procedures. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RELIABILITY QUALIFICATION OF POWER AMPLIFIER MODULESStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD237 | Mar 2014 |
This standard is intended to identify a core set of qualification tests that apply specifically for Power Amplifier Modules and their primary application in mobile devices such as cellular phones. This standard is intended to describe specific stresses and failure mechanisms that are specific to compound semiconductors and power amplifier modules. It is intended to establish more meaningful and efficient qualification testing. Committee(s): JC-14.7 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RELIABILITY QUALIFICATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES BASED ON PHYSICS OF FAILURE RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENTStatus: Reaffirmed September 2019 |
JEP148B | Jan 2014 |
A concept is outlined, which proactively integrates qualification into the development process and provides a systematic procedure as support tool to development and gives early focus on required activities. It converts requirements for a product into measures of development and qualification in combination with a risk and opportunity assessment step and accompanies the development process as guiding and recording tool for advanced quality planning and confirmation. The collected data enlarge the knowledge database for DFR / BIR (design for reliability / building-in reliability) to be used for future projects. The procedure challenges and promotes teamwork of all involved disciplines. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FIELD-INDUCED CHARGED-DEVICE MODEL TEST METHOD FOR ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE WITHSTAND THRESHOLDS OF MICROELECTRONIC COMPONENTSStatus: Rescinded February 2020 |
JESD22-C101F | Oct 2013 |
The material in this test method has been superseded by JS-002-2018, published January 2019, which in turn has been superseded by JS-002-2022, published January 2023. |
||
QUALITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT (SUPERSEDES EIA670): |
JESD670A | Oct 2013 |
This standard provides a checklist that is intended as a tool to allow users to assess the level of compliance of a quality management system to the requirements ISO 9001:2008. The questions in this checklist are of a generic nature and intended to be applicable to all organizations, not just those involved in the electronics industry. It can be useful while performing self-assessments of the organization or other internal audit procedures. It is not intended for use by a contracted third party registrar during a formal audit to the requirements of ISO 9001:2008. Committee(s): JC-14.4 |
||
GUIDE TO STANDARDS AND PUBLICATIONS RELATING TO QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HARDWARE |
JEP70C | Oct 2013 |
This document gathers and organizes common standards and publications relating to quality processes and methods relating to the solid-state, microelectronics, and associated industries. This is intended to facilitate access to the applicable documents when working with electronic hardware. This will have a positive effect on quality and reliability as users gain more access to proper methods in designing, producing, and testing parts. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SALT ATMOSPHEREStatus: Reaffirmed September 2020 |
JESD22-A107C | Apr 2013 |
Salt atmosphere is a destructive, accelerated stress that simulates the effects of severe seacoast atmosphere on all exposed surfaces. Such stressing and post-stress testing determine the resistance of solid-state devices to corrosion and may be performed on commercial and industrial product in molded or hermetic packages. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RF BIASED LIFE (RFBL) TESTStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD226 | Jan 2013 |
This stress method is used to determine the effects of RF bias conditions and temperature on Power Amplifier Modules (PAMs) over time. These conditions are intended to simulate the devices’ operating condition in an accelerated way, and they are expected to be applied primarily for device qualification and reliability monitoring. The purpose of this test is for use to determine the effects of nominal DC and RF bias conditions and high temperature on Power Amplifier Modules (PAMs) over time. It simulates the devices’ operating condition in an accelerated way, and is primarily intended for device qualification testing and reliability monitoring which stresses all of the modules’ thermal and electrical failure mechanisms anticipated in typical use. Committee(s): JC-14.7 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
IPC/JEDEC-9704A: PRINTED WIRING BOARD (PWB) STRAIN GAGE TEST GUIDELINE |
JS9704A | Jan 2012 |
This document describes specific guidelines for strain gage testing for Printed Wiring Board (PWB)assemblies. The suggested procedures enables board manufacturers to conduct required strain gage testing independently, and provides a quantitative method for measuring board flexure, and assessing risk levels. The topics covered include: Test setup and equipment; requirements; Strain measurement; Report format Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION OF PRODUCT/PROCESS CHANGES BY SOLID-STATE SUPPLIERSStatus: SupersededBy J-STD-046, July 2016 |
JESD46D | Dec 2011 |
This standard establishes procedures to notify customers of semiconductor product and process changes. Requirements include: documentation; procedures for classification, notification and customer response; content; and records. Documentation of a suppliers change notification system should set clear and understandable expectations for both the originators of the change and their end customers. |
||
PRODUCT DISCONTINUANCEStatus: Supersededby J-STD-048, November 2014 |
JESD48C | Dec 2011 |
This standard establishes the requirements for timely customer notification of planned product discontinuance, which will assist customers in managing end-of-life supply, or to transition on-going requirements to alternate products. |
||
HERMETICITYStatus: Reaffirmed September 2017 |
JESD22-A109B | Nov 2011 |
Testing for hermeticity on commercial product is not normally done on standard molded devices that are not hermetic. Commercial product that this test method applies to has a construction that produces a hermetic package; examples of this are ceramic and metal packages. Most of these tests are controlled and updated in the military standards, the two standards that apply are MIL-STD-750 for discretes, & MIL-STD-883 for microcircuits. The test within these standards can be used for all package types. Within these standards the tests are similar; MIL-STD-750 Test Method 1071 Hermetic Seal is recommended for any commercial hermetic requirements. For MIL-STD-883 the applicable test method is 1014 Seal. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARKING PERMANENCYStatus: Reaffirmed August 2024 |
JESD22-B107D | Mar 2011 |
This test method provides two tests for determining the marking permanency of ink marked integrated circuits. A new non-destructive tape test method is introduced to quickly determine marking integrity. The test method also specifies a resistance to solvents method based upon MIL Std 883 Method 2015. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SYSTEM LEVEL ESD PART 1: COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS AND RECOMMENDED BASIC APPROACHESStatus: ReaffirmedApril 2023 |
JEP161 | Jan 2011 |
This report is the first part of a two part document. Part I will primarily address hard failures characterized by physical damage to a system (failure category d as classified by IEC 61000-4-2). Soft failures, in which the system’s operation is upset without physical damage, are also critical and predominant in many cases. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD) SENSITIVITY TESTING MACHINE MODEL (MM)This document is inactive as of September 2016 |
JESD22-A115C | Nov 2010 |
JESD22-A115 is a reference document; it is not a requirement per JESD47 (Stress Test Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits). Machine Model (MM) as described in JESD22-A115 should not be used as a requirement for integrated circuit ESD qualification. Only human-body model (HBM) and charged-device model (CDM) are the necessary ESD qualification test methods as specified in JESD47. Refer to JEP172: Discontinuing Use of the Machine Model for Device ESD Qualification for more information. Committee(s): JC-14.1 |
||
COPLANARITY TEST FOR SURFACE-MOUNT SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESStatus: Reaffirmed February 2023 |
JESD22-B108B | Sep 2010 |
The purpose of this test is to measure the deviation of the terminals (leads or solder balls) from coplanarity at room temperature for surface-mount semiconductor devices. This test method is applicable for inspection and device characterization. If package warpage or coplanarity is to be characterized at reflow soldering temperatures, then JESD22-B112 should be used. Free download. Registration or login required. |