Global Standards for the Microelectronics Industry
Standards & Documents Search
Title | Document # | Date |
---|---|---|
TEMPERATURE, BIAS, AND OPERATING LIFE |
JESD22-A108G | Nov 2022 |
This test is used to determine the effects of bias conditions and temperature on solid state devices over time. It simulates the devices’ operating condition in an accelerated way, and is primarily for device qualification and reliability monitoring. A form of high temperature bias life using a short duration, popularly known as burn-in, may be used to screen for infant mortality related failures. The detailed use and application of burn-in is outside the scope of this document. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
JOINT IPC/JEDEC STANDARD FOR HANDLING, PACKING, SHIPPING, AND USE OF MOISTURE/REFLOW SENSITIVE SURFACE-MOUNT DEVICES |
J-STD-033D | Apr 2018 |
The purpose of this document is to provide manufacturers and users with standardized methods for handling, packing, shipping, and use of moisture/reflow and process sensitive devices that have been classified to the levels defined in J-STD-020 or J-STD-075. These methods are provided to avoid damage from moisture absorption and exposure to solder reflow temperatures that can result in yield and reliability degradation. By using these procedures, safe and damage-free reflow can be achieved. The dry-packing process defined herein provides a minimum shelf life of 12 months from the seal date. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
HERMETICITYStatus: Reaffirmed September 2017 |
JESD22-A109B | Nov 2011 |
Testing for hermeticity on commercial product is not normally done on standard molded devices that are not hermetic. Commercial product that this test method applies to has a construction that produces a hermetic package; examples of this are ceramic and metal packages. Most of these tests are controlled and updated in the military standards, the two standards that apply are MIL-STD-750 for discretes, & MIL-STD-883 for microcircuits. The test within these standards can be used for all package types. Within these standards the tests are similar; MIL-STD-750 Test Method 1071 Hermetic Seal is recommended for any commercial hermetic requirements. For MIL-STD-883 the applicable test method is 1014 Seal. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SALT ATMOSPHEREStatus: Reaffirmed September 2020 |
JESD22-A107C | Apr 2013 |
Salt atmosphere is a destructive, accelerated stress that simulates the effects of severe seacoast atmosphere on all exposed surfaces. Such stressing and post-stress testing determine the resistance of solid-state devices to corrosion and may be performed on commercial and industrial product in molded or hermetic packages. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RF BIASED LIFE (RFBL) TESTStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD226 | Jan 2013 |
This stress method is used to determine the effects of RF bias conditions and temperature on Power Amplifier Modules (PAMs) over time. These conditions are intended to simulate the devices’ operating condition in an accelerated way, and they are expected to be applied primarily for device qualification and reliability monitoring. The purpose of this test is for use to determine the effects of nominal DC and RF bias conditions and high temperature on Power Amplifier Modules (PAMs) over time. It simulates the devices’ operating condition in an accelerated way, and is primarily intended for device qualification testing and reliability monitoring which stresses all of the modules’ thermal and electrical failure mechanisms anticipated in typical use. Committee(s): JC-14.7 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHARACTERIZATION OF INTERFACIAL ADHESION IN SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES |
JEP167A | Nov 2020 |
This document identifies methods used for the characterization of die adhesion. It gives guidance which method to apply in which phase of the product or technology life cycle. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RECOMMENDED ESD TARGET LEVELS FOR HBM/MM QUALIFICATIONStatus: Reaffirmed January 2024 |
JEP155B | Jul 2018 |
This document was written with the intent to provide information for quality organizations in both semiconductor companies and their customers to assess and make decisions on safe ESD level requirements. It will be shown through this document why realistic modifying of the ESD target levels for component level ESD is not only essential but is also urgent. The document is organized in different sections to give as many technical details as possible to support the purpose given in the abstract. In June 2009 the formulating committee approved the addition of the ESDA logo on the covers of this document. Please see Annex C for revision history. Reaffirmed: January 2024 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RECOMMENDED ESD-CDM TARGET LEVELS |
JEP157A | Apr 2022 |
This document was written with the intent to provide information for quality organizations in both semiconductor companies and their customers to assess and make decisions on safe ESD CDM level requirements. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SYSTEM LEVEL ESD: PART II: IMPLEMENTATION OF EFFECTIVE ESD ROBUST DESIGNSThis is an editorial revision, details can be found in Annex F. |
JEP162A.01 | Jan 2021 |
This document, while establishing the complex nature of System Level ESD, proposes that an efficient ESD design can only be achieved when the interaction of the various components under ESD conditions are analyzed at the system level. This objective requires an appropriate characterization of the components and a methodology to assess the entire system using simulation data. This is applicable to system failures of different categories (such as hard, soft, and electromagnetic interference (EMI)). This type of systematic approach is long overdue and represents an advanced design approach which replaces the misconception, as discussed in detail in JEP161, that a system will be sufficiently robust if all components exceed a certain ESD level. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Requirements for Handling Electrostatic-Discharge-Sensitive (ESDS) Devices |
JESD625C.01 | Mar 2024 |
This standard applies to devices susceptible to damage by electrostatic discharge greater than 100 volts human body model (HBM) and 200 volts charged device model (CDM). Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL SHOCK – DEVICE AND SUBASSEMBLY |
JESD22-B110B.01 | Jun 2019 |
Device and Subassembly Mechanical Shock Test Method is intended to evaluate devices in the free state and assembled to printed wiring boards for use in electrical equipment. The method is intended to determine the compatibility of devices and subassemblies to withstand moderately severe shocks. The use of subassemblies is a means to test devices in usage conditions as assembled to printed wiring boards. Mechanical Shock due to suddenly applied forces, or abrupt change in motion produced by handling, transportation or field operation may disturb operating characteristics, particularly if the shock pulses are repetitive. This is a destructive test intended for device qualification.This document also replaces JESD22-B104. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CYCLED TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY-BIAS WITH SURFACE CONDENSATION LIFE TEST |
JESD22-A100E | Nov 2020 |
The Cycled Temperature-humidity-bias Life Test is performed for the purpose of evaluating the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs conditions of temperature cycling, humidity, and bias that accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors that pass through it. The Cycled Temperature-Humidity-Bias Life Test is typically performed on cavity packages (e.g., MQUADs, lidded ceramic pin grid arrays, etc.) as an alternative to JESD22-A101 or JESD22-A110. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
TEST METHODS TO CHARACTERIZE VOIDING IN PRE-SMT BALL GRID ARRAY PACKAGES |
JESD217A.01 | Nov 2022 |
This publication provides an overview of solder void types, outlines current metrologies and test methods used for pre-SMPT solder void characterization and potential limitations, and prescribes sampling strategy for data collection, and tolerance guidelines for corrective measures. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
QUALITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT (SUPERSEDES EIA670): |
JESD670A | Oct 2013 |
This standard provides a checklist that is intended as a tool to allow users to assess the level of compliance of a quality management system to the requirements ISO 9001:2008. The questions in this checklist are of a generic nature and intended to be applicable to all organizations, not just those involved in the electronics industry. It can be useful while performing self-assessments of the organization or other internal audit procedures. It is not intended for use by a contracted third party registrar during a formal audit to the requirements of ISO 9001:2008. Committee(s): JC-14.4 |
||
GUIDE TO STANDARDS AND PUBLICATIONS RELATING TO QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HARDWARE |
JEP70C | Oct 2013 |
This document gathers and organizes common standards and publications relating to quality processes and methods relating to the solid-state, microelectronics, and associated industries. This is intended to facilitate access to the applicable documents when working with electronic hardware. This will have a positive effect on quality and reliability as users gain more access to proper methods in designing, producing, and testing parts. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SYMBOL AND LABEL FOR ELECTROSTATIC SENSITIVE DEVICESStatus: Reaffirmed October 1988, September 1996, September 2009, May 2018, October 2024 |
JESD471 | Feb 1980 |
This standard will be useful to anyone engaged in handling semiconductor devices and integrated circuits that are subject to permanent damage due to electrostatic potentials. The standard establishes a symbol and label that will gain the attention of those persons who might inflict electrostatic damage to the device. The label which is placed on the lowest practical level of packaging contains the words 'ATTENTION - OBSERVE PRECAUTIONS FOR HANDLING ELECTROSTATIC SENSITIVE DEVICES'. The symbol contained in this label, which may be used on the device itself, shows a hand in a triangle with a bar through it. Formerly known as EIA-471. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MONITORINGStatus: Reaffirmed June 2011, May 2022 |
JESD659C | Apr 2017 |
This method establishes requirements for application of Statistical Reliability Monitoring 'SRM' technology to monitor and improve the reliability of electronic components and subassemblies. The standard also describes the condition under with a monitor may be replaced or eliminated. Formerly known as EIA-659, that superseded JESD29-A (July 1996). Became JESD659 after revision, September 1999. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Information Requirements for the Qualification of Solid State Devices |
JESD69D | Jun 2024 |
This standard defines the requirements for the device qualification package, which the supplier provides to the customer. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MAVERICK PRODUCT ELIMINATION AND OUTLIER MANAGEMENTStatus: Reaffirmed |
JESD50C | Jan 2018 |
This standard applies to the identification and control of Maverick Product that can occur during fabrication, assembly, packaging, or test of any electronic component. It can be implemented for an entire product line or to segregate product that has a higher probability of adversely impacting quality or reliability. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FIELD-INDUCED CHARGED-DEVICE MODEL TEST METHOD FOR ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE WITHSTAND THRESHOLDS OF MICROELECTRONIC COMPONENTSStatus: Rescinded February 2020 |
JESD22-C101F | Oct 2013 |
The material in this test method has been superseded by JS-002-2018, published January 2019, which in turn has been superseded by JS-002-2022, published January 2023. |
||
RELIABILITY QUALIFICATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES BASED ON PHYSICS OF FAILURE RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENTStatus: Reaffirmed September 2019 |
JEP148B | Jan 2014 |
A concept is outlined, which proactively integrates qualification into the development process and provides a systematic procedure as support tool to development and gives early focus on required activities. It converts requirements for a product into measures of development and qualification in combination with a risk and opportunity assessment step and accompanies the development process as guiding and recording tool for advanced quality planning and confirmation. The collected data enlarge the knowledge database for DFR / BIR (design for reliability / building-in reliability) to be used for future projects. The procedure challenges and promotes teamwork of all involved disciplines. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FOUNDRY PROCESS QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES - BACKEND OF LIFE (Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Sites) |
JEP001-1A | Sep 2018 |
This document describes backend-level test and data methods for the qualification of semiconductor technologies. It does not give pass or fail values or recommend specific test equipment, test structures or test algorithms. Wherever possible, it references applicable JEDEC such as JESD47 or other widely accepted standards for requirements documentation. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Guideline for Characterizing Solder Bump Electromigration Under Constant Current and Temperature Stress |
JEP154A | Mar 2024 |
This publication describes a method to test the electromigration susceptibility of solder bumps, including other types of bumps, such as solder capped copper pillars, used in flip-chip packages. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHIP-PACKAGE INTERACTION UNDERSTANDING, IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION |
JEP156A | Mar 2018 |
This publication references a set of frequently recommended and accepted JEDEC reliability stress tests. These tests are used for qualifying new and modified technology/ process/ product families, as well as individual solid state surface-mount products. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Guidelines for Visual Inspection and Control of Flip Chip Type Packages (FCxGA) |
JEP170A | Jun 2024 |
This document provides guidelines for visual inspection and control that ensures quality and reliability of flip chip packaged devices. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
RELIABILITY QUALIFICATION OF POWER AMPLIFIER MODULESStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD237 | Mar 2014 |
This standard is intended to identify a core set of qualification tests that apply specifically for Power Amplifier Modules and their primary application in mobile devices such as cellular phones. This standard is intended to describe specific stresses and failure mechanisms that are specific to compound semiconductors and power amplifier modules. It is intended to establish more meaningful and efficient qualification testing. Committee(s): JC-14.7 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION PROCESS FOR DISASTERS |
JESD246A | Jan 2020 |
This standard establishes the requirements for timely notification to affected customers after a disaster has occurred at a supplier’s facility that will affect the committed delivery of product. This standard puts specific emphasis on notification, timing, and notification content which includes risk exposure, impact analysis, and recovery plans. This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, solid-state products and the constituent components used within. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DISTRIBUTORS OF COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES |
JESD31F | Aug 2021 |
This standard identifies the general requirements for Distributors that supply Commercial and Military products. This standard applies to all discrete semiconductors, integrated circuits and Hybrids, whether packaged or in wafer/die form, manufactured by all Manufacturers. The requirements defined within this document are only applicable to products for which ownership remains with the Distributor or Manufacturer. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Stress-Test-Driven Qualification of and Failure Mechanisms Associated with Assembled Solid State Surface-Mount Devices |
JEP150A | Dec 2023 |
This publication contains frequently recommended and accepted JEDEC reliability stress tests applied to surface-mount solid state devices. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FAILURE-MECHANISM-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MONITORING - SUPERSEDED BY EIA/ANSI-659, July 1996.Status: Superseded |
JESD29-A | Jul 1996 |
Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING OF THERMAL STRESS TEST OVEN TEMPERATURESStatus: Reaffirmed September 2019 |
JEP153A | Mar 2014 |
This document provides an industry standard method for characterization and monitoring thermal stress test oven temperatures. The procedures described in this document should be used to insure thermal stress test conditions are being achieved and maintained during various test procedures. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
SOLDER BALL SHEARStatus: Reaffirmed September 2020 |
JESD22-B117B | May 2014 |
The purpose of this test is conducted to assess the ability of solder balls to withstand mechanical shear forces that may be applied during device manufacturing, handling, test, shipment and end-use conditions. Solder ball shear is a destructive test. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
A PROCEDURE FOR EXECUTING SWEAT:Status: Reaffirmed October 2012, September 2018 |
JEP119A | Aug 2003 |
This document describes an algorithm for performing the Standard Wafer Level Electromigration Accelerated Test (SWEAT) method with computer controlled instrumentation. The algorithm requires a separate iterative technique (not provided) to calculate the force current for a given target time to failure. This document does not specify what test structure to use with this procedure. However, users of this algorithm report its effectiveness on both straight-lines and via-terminated test structures. Some test-structures design features are provided in JESD87 and in ASTM 1259M - 96. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
GUIDELINE FOR CONSTANT TEMPERATURE AGING TO CHARACTERIZE ALUMINUM INTERCONNECT METALLIZATIONS FOR STRESS-INDUCED VOIDING:Status: ReaffirmedOctober 2012 |
JEP139 | Dec 2000 |
This document describes a constant temperature (isothermal) aging method for testing aluminum (Al) metallization test structures on microelectronics wafers for susceptibility to stress-induced voiding. This method is valid for metallization/dielectric systems in which the dielectric is deposited onto the metallization at a temperature considerably above the intended use temperature, and above or equal to the deposition temperature of the metal. Although this is a wafer test, it is not a fast (less than 5 minutes per probe) test. It is intended to be used for lifetime prediction and failure analysis, not for production Go-NoGo lot checking. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
STANDARD METHOD FOR MEASURING AND USING THE TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT OF RESISTANCE TO DETERMINE THE TEMPERATURE OF A METALLIZATION LINE:Status: Reaffirmed October 2012, September 2018 |
JESD33B | Feb 2004 |
This newly revised test method provides a procedure for measuring the temperature coefficient of resistance, TCR(T), of thin-film metallizations used in microelectronic circuits and devices. Procedures are also provided to use the TCR(T) to determine the temperature of a metallization line under Joule-heating conditions and to determine the ambient temperature where the metallization line is used as a temperature sensor. Originally, the method was intended only for aluminum-based metallizations and for other metallizations that satisfy the linear dependence and stability stipulations of the method. The method has been revised to make it explicitly applicable to copper-based metallizations, as well, and at temperatures beyond where the resistivity of copper is no longer linearly dependent on temperature (beyond approximately 200 °C). Using the TCR(T) measured for copper in the linear-dependent region, a factor is used to correct the calculated temperature at these higher temperatures. Committee(s): JC-14.2 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
FLIP CHIP TENSILE PULL |
JESD22-B109C | Mar 2021 |
The Flip Chip Tensile Pull Test Method is performed to determine the fracture mode and strength of the solder bump interconnection between the flip chip die and the substrate. It should be used to assess the consistency of the chip join process. This test method is a destructive test. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MEASURING WHISKER GROWTH ON TIN AND TIN ALLOY SURFACE FINISHESStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, September 2019 |
JESD22-A121A | Jul 2008 |
The predominant terminal finishes on electronic components have been Sn-Pb alloys. As the industry moves toward Pb-free components and assembly processes, the predominant terminal finish materials will be pure Sn and alloys of Sn, including Sn-Bi and Sn-Ag Pure Sn and Sn-based alloy electrodeposits and solder-dipped finishes may grow tin whiskers, which could electrically short across component terminals or break off the component and degrade the performance of electrical or mechanical parts. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
IPC/JEDEC-9703: MECHANICAL SHOCK TEST GUIDELINE FOR SOLDER JOINT RELIABILITYStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, May 2019 |
JS9703 | Mar 2009 |
This document establishes mechanical shock test guidelines for assessing solder joint reliability of Printed Circuit Board (PCB) assemblies from system to component level. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
TEST METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF MOISTURE DIFFUSIVITY AND WATER SOLUBILITY IN ORGANIC MATERIALS USED IN ELECTRONIC DEVICES |
JESD22-A120C | Jan 2022 |
This standard details the procedures for the measurement of characteristic bulk material properties of moisture diffusivity and water solubility in organic materials used in the packaging of electronic devices. These two material properties are important parameters for the effective reliability performance of plastic packaged surface mount devices after exposure to moisture and subjected to high temperature solder reflow. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
CLASSIFICATION OF PASSIVE AND SOLID STATE DEVICES FOR ASSEMBLY PROCESSES |
J-STD-075A | May 2018 |
This is a Joint Standard between ECIA, IPC, and JEDEC. The purpose of this specification is to establish an agreed to set of worst case solder assembly process conditions to which devices are evaluated. The generated PSL rating will convey the conditions to which a device can be safely attached to FR4 type or ceramic laminates using SMT reflow and solder wave/fountain soldering processes. It is important for device manufacturers (hereafter referred to as “suppliers”), users, and (PWB) assemblers to be highly familiar with this standard’s information and processes to insure optimal device quality and reliability. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD. However, this document is available to the JEDEC formulating Committee members on the JC-14 Resources tab on the Members' website. The lead organization is ECIA. Committee(s): JC-14 |
||
Guidelines for Supplier Performance Rating |
JEP146B | May 2023 |
This publication establishes guidelines and provides examples by which customers can measure their suppliers based on mutually agreed upon objective criteria. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Temperature Cycling |
JESD22-A104F.01 | Apr 2023 |
This standard applies to single-, dual- and triple-chamber temperature cycling in an air or other gaseous medium and covers component and solder interconnection testing. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TIN WHISKER SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TIN AND TIN ALLOY SURFACE FINISHEDStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, January 2020 |
JESD201A | Sep 2008 |
The methodology described in this document is applicable for environmental acceptance testing of tin based surface finishes and mitigation practices for tin whiskers. This methodology may not be sufficient for applications with special requirements, (i.e., military, aerospace, etc.). Additional requirements may be specified in the appropriate requirements (procurement) documentation. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
JOINT IPC/JEDEC Standard Moisture/Reflow Sensitivity Classification for Non-hermetic Surface Mount Devices (SMDs) |
J-STD-020F | Dec 2022 |
The purpose of this standard is to identify the classification level of non-hermetic SMDs that are sensitive to moisture-induced stress so that they can be properly packaged, stored, and handled to avoid damage during assembly solder reflow attachment and/or repair operations. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MARKING, SYMBOLS, AND LABELS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF LEAD (Pb) FREE ASSEMBLIES, COMPONENTS, AND DEVICES - SUPERSEDED BY J-STD-609, August 2007Status: Supersededby J-STD-609, August 2007 |
JESD97 | May 2004 |
Committee(s): JC-14.1, JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
MECHANICAL SHOCKStatus: Supersededby JEDEC JESD22-B110B, July 2013 |
JESD22-B104C | Nov 2004 |
This test is intended to determine the suitability of component parts for use in electronic equipment that may be subjected to moderately severe shocks as a result of suddenly applied forces or abrupt changes in motion produced by rough handling, transportation, or field operation. Shock of this type may disturb operating characteristics, particularly if the shock pulses are repetitive. This is a destructive test intended for device qualification. It is normally applicable to cavity-type packages. |
||
SYMBOL AND LABELS FOR MOISTURE-SENSITIVE DEVICES - SUPERSEDED BY J-STD-033, April 2018.Status: Rescinded, November 2018 |
JEP113B | May 1999 |
Certain PSMC (Plastic Surface-mount Components) are subject to permanent damage due to moisture-induced failures encountered during high-temperature surface-mount processing unless appropriate precautions are observed. The purpose of this publication is to provide a distinctive symbol and labels to be used to identify those devices that require special packing and handling precautions. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Definition of “Low-Halogen” For Electronic Products |
JS709D | Jan 2024 |
This standard provides terms and definitions for “low-halogen” electronic products. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
Statistical Process Control Systems |
JESD557D | May 2023 |
This standard specifies the general requirements of a statistical process control (SPC) system. Committee(s): JC-14 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
EARLY LIFE FAILURE RATE CALCULATION PROCEDURE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS:Status: Reaffirmed January 2014, September 2019 |
JESD74A | Feb 2007 |
This standard defines methods for calculating the early life failure rate of a product, using accelerated testing, whose failure rate is constant or decreasing over time. For technologies where there is adequate field failure data, alternative methods may be used to establish the early life failure rate. The purpose of this standard is to define a procedure for performing measurement and calculation of early life failure rates. Projections can be used to compare reliability performance with objectives, provide line feedback, support service cost estimates, and set product test and screen strategies to ensure that the ELFR meets customers' requirements. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
METHODS FOR CALCULATING FAILURE RATES IN UNITS OF FITS |
JESD85A | Jul 2021 |
This standard establishes methods for calculating failure rates in units of FITs by using data in varying degrees of detail such that results can be obtained from almost any data set. The objective is to provide a reference to the way failure rates are calculated. Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS ASSESSMENTStatus: Reaffirmed May 2014, September 2020 |
JESD86A | Oct 2009 |
This standard is intended to describe various methods for obtaining electrical variate data on devices currently produced on the manufacturing and testing process to be qualified. The intent is to assess the device's capability to function within the specification parameters over time and the application environment (operating range of temperature, voltage, humidity, input/output levels, noise, power supply stability etc.). Committee(s): JC-14.3 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PRODUCT DISCONTINUANCEStatus: Supersededby J-STD-048, November 2014 |
JESD48C | Dec 2011 |
This standard establishes the requirements for timely customer notification of planned product discontinuance, which will assist customers in managing end-of-life supply, or to transition on-going requirements to alternate products. |
||
JOINT JEDEC/IPC/ECIA STANDARD - NOTIFICATION STANDARD FOR PRODUCT DISCONTINUANCE |
J-STD-048 | Nov 2014 |
This document supersedes JESD48. This standard is applicable to suppliers of, and affected customers for, electronic products and their constituent components. The goal of this notification standard is to better enable customers to manage and mitigate the disruption caused by the discontinuation of a product and ensure continuity of supply. This standard establishes the requirements for timely customer notification of planned product discontinuance, which will assist customers in managing end-of-life supply, or to transition ongoing requirements to alternate products. Committee(s): JC-14.4 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF LOW-k/METAL INTER/INTRA-LEVEL DIELECTRIC INTEGRITY |
JEP159A | Jul 2015 |
This document is intended for use in the semiconductor IC manufacturing industry and provides reliability characterization techniques for low-k inter/intra level dielectrics (ILD) for the evaluation and control of ILD processes. It describes procedures developed for estimating the general integrity of back end-of-line (BEOL) ILD. Two basic test procedures are described, the Voltage-Ramp Dielectric Breakdown (VRDB) test, and the Constant Voltage Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown stress (CVS). Each test is designed for different reliability and process evaluation purposes. This document also describes robust techniques to detect breakdown and TDDB data analysis. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
BEADED THERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGESStatus: ReaffirmedJune 2006, September 2011, January 2015 |
JEP140 | Jun 2002 |
The beaded thermocouple temperature measurement guideline provides a procedure to accurately and consistently measure the temperature of semiconductor packages during exposure to thermal excursions. The guideline applications can include, but not limited to, temperature profile measurement in reliability test chambers and solder reflow operations that are associated with component assembly to printed wiring boards. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ACCELERATED MOISTURE RESISTANCE - UNBIASED HAST |
JESD22-A118B.01 | May 2021 |
The Unbiased HAST is performed for the purpose of evaluating the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid-state devices in humid environments. It is a highly accelerated test which employs temperature and humidity under noncondensing conditions to accelerate the penetration of moisture through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors that pass through it. Bias is not applied in this test to ensure the failure mechanisms potentially overshadowed by bias can be uncovered (e.g., galvanic corrosion). This test is used to identify failure mechanisms internal to the package and is destructive. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ACCELERATED MOISTURE RESISTANCE - UNBIASED AUTOCLAVEStatus: Reaffirmed January 2021 |
JESD22-A102E | Jul 2015 |
This test allows the user to evaluate the moisture resistance of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices. The Unbiased Autoclave Test is performed to evaluate the moisture resistance integrity of non-hermetic packaged solid state devices using moisture condensing or moisture saturated steam environments. It is a highly accelerated test that employs conditions of pressure, humidity and temperature under condensing conditions to accelerate moisture penetration through the external protective material (encapsulant or seal) or along the interface between the external protective material and the metallic conductors passing through it. This test is used to identify failure mechanisms internal to the package and is destructive. Committee(s): JC-14.1 Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
STEADY-STATE TEMPERATURE-HUMIDITY BIAS LIFE TEST |
JESD22-A101D.01 | Jan 2021 |
This standard establishes a defined method and conditions for performing a temperature-humidity life test with bias applied. The test is used to evaluate the reliability of nonhermetic packaged solid state devices in humid environments. It employs high temperature and humidity conditions to accelerate the penetration of moisture through external protective material or along interfaces between the external protective coating and conductors or other features that pass through it. This revision enhances the ability to perform this test on a device which cannot be biased to achieve very low power dissipation. Free download. Registration or login required. |
||
ELECTRICALLY ERASABLE PROGRAMMABLE ROM (EEPROM) PROGRAM/ERASE ENDURANCE AND DATA RETENTION TESTStatus: Reaffirmed October 2024 |
JESD22-A117E | Nov 2018 |
This stress test is intended to determine the ability of an EEPROM integrated circuit or an integrated circuit with an EEPROM module (such as a microprocessor) to sustain repeated data changes without failure (program/erase endurance) and to retain data for the expected life of the EEPROM (data retention). This Standard specifies the procedural requirements for performing valid endurance and retention tests based on a qualification specification. Endurance and retention qualification specifications (for cycle counts, durations, temperatures, and sample sizes) are specified in JESD47 or may be developed using knowledge-based methods as in JESD94. Free download. Registration or login required. |